Environmental and Climate Crises as a Factor in the Development of Modern Constitutionalism and Environmental Security

Due to the significant and often deliberate human impact on natural environment, there are serious problems facing both present future generations of people. Today, ethical, religious, political economic arguments in favor preserving protecting environment unfortunately not taken seriously enough society. Our responsibilities towards other people explain why we have environment. On hand, is a growing voice recognizing that our duties nature derive from rights very components nature, its flora fauna. This raises question nature. The constitutions individual states interpret as subject rights. assumed interconnectedness humans introduces systemic worldview. shift holistic narrative serves catalyst for acceptance new "rights nature" embody distinctive position agricultural environmental ethics sets limits activity justifies partnership with planet. Legal equality perceived prerequisite symmetrical conceptualization relations planet.The policy "green state" aimed at ensuring sustainable development, which, among things, includes rights, reducing socio-economic inequalities, eradicating injustice (both within nation-states, regionally globally, well between generations) needs economy do exceed regenerative capacity ecosystems which this depends. In context, need research institutional dynamics nation-state moving away unsustainable development paths. Living ("green") order, different current liberal-democratic one based laws free market, requires legal, primarily constitutional, innovations. purpose article invite broad debate ecological state, content correlation traditional principles constitutionalism, national security policy. Such discussion will contribute recognition greening constitution interests improving security.